🔗 Share this article

During the previous presidential campaign, the former president courted the electorate with promises to reduce costs starting on day one. But, once he assumed office, he seemed to pay precious little attention to the cost of living. This shifted after inflation-weary citizens expressed dissatisfaction at the ballot box. Shortly thereafter, his team initiated a hastily assembled campaign to address living costs. Regrettably, the drive is a hot mess—filled with illogical claims, contradictions, magical thinking, scapegoating, and misleading statements.

Detached Assertions and Grocery Store Truth

Just two days post-election, the president kicked off his affordability drive with a poorly received statement: “Our groceries are way down. All items is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” These words from the wealthy leader—who frequently mingles with fellow billionaires—revealed utter contempt for millions of Americans who struggle every time they go supermarkets. In effect, he dismissed their concerns as unimportant, suggesting they had it wrong about price levels.

This statement that everything was “way down” was absurdly obtuse and inaccurate. How could all costs be falling when the taxes he imposed were increasing prices? Official statistics indicate the cost of bananas rose nearly 7% over the past year, beef prices climbed 14.7%, and coffee prices surged by nearly 19%—in part because of import taxes applied to Brazilian products. Between January and September, prices rose in the majority of main grocery groups monitored by the government’s price index, including meats, poultry, and fish (up 4.5%), drinks (increasing nearly 3%), and fruits and vegetables (up 1.3%).

Contradictions and Inaccuracies in Financial Claims

Despite the evidence, the president continues to push his misleading narrative about lower costs. After the vote, he has stated there is “almost no price increases,” insisted “costs have fallen significantly,” and argued “it is far less expensive under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” Such remarks ignore the fact that prices overall have unarguably risen since Biden left office. At present, price growth is at a 3% annual rate, that’s half again as much than the Federal Reserve’s 2% goal. In another falsehood, Trump claimed that fuel costs had dropped to around two dollars, even though official data indicate they average $3.19.

Faced with actual conditions and declining opinion polls, some Trump aides evidently cautioned that his “costs are falling” message made him sound disconnected from typical Americans. Many citizens are frustrated about rising costs following promises of reductions. In response, advisers proposed one quick fix: roll back some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. The logical move contradicted Trump’s absurd assertion that new tariffs wouldn’t raise prices for US consumers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Possible Impact

With some tariffs being rolled back on several food items, the administration will likely announce that he has cut prices once those foods begin to fall in price. This would be like an arsonist taking credit for putting out a fire that he had started. In another instance, when addressing fast-food leaders, he declared that “we are in the golden age of America” and assured the audience that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” Such statements come naturally for a wealthy individual to make, but they ring hollow to millions of Americans who are struggling—particularly when millions face cuts to nutrition assistance or rising insurance costs.

According to a survey conducted last fall, 74% of Americans think the state of the economy are fair or poor, while just a quarter consider them good or excellent. A separate survey showed that 61% of Americans feel Trump’s policies have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Financial Reality and Suggested Steps

The treasury secretary, the president’s top economic official, recently disputed assertions of a golden age. He stated that far from booming, certain sectors of the US economy “are in recession.” Industrial production—a priority for the administration—appears to have contracted for eight months in a row and shed around tens of thousands of positions this year. Pointing to these challenges, the secretary called on the central bank to cut interest rates—a move that could ease financial pressure.

Reacting to widespread concern about living costs, Trump proposed a direct payment of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” not for “the wealthy.” For many households in need, this sounds like manna from heaven, but it is unlikely that Congress—already alarmed about large shortfalls—will enact such a plan. This idea could raise government expenditure, increase borrowing costs, and potentially fuel inflation by putting more money into the economy.

Another proposed solution for affordability centered on creating half-century home loans, based on the idea that this would lower housing costs. But, the truth is that such lengthy loans would do little to lower monthly payments—often cutting them by a small amount each month. The downside is that these mortgages could more than double the overall cost homeowners pay and slow building home value.

Blaming the Past Government and Financial Outlook

As part of their cost-cutting effort, the administration have once more pointed fingers at Biden for financial challenges, such as rising prices. Spokespeople stated they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up Biden’s inflation.” These are absurd and untruthful allegations. In reality, the former president handed over a strong economy, with inflation way down, solid expansion, and unemployment low. However, Trump’s policies—particularly import taxes—have created an economic mess, driving costs higher and slowing GDP growth.

Per Mark Zandi, lead analyst at a research firm, numerous regions are already in recession, with their economies damaged by Trump’s tariffs. He fears that if large states like major economies enter a downturn, the US could slide into a widespread recession. In downturns, people typically have less money to spend, and inflation often falls. Unfortunately, given Trump’s much-ballyhooed cost initiative probably ineffective to hold down prices, his most effective “tool” for achieving increased affordability might prove to be triggering an economic contraction—something that hard-pressed households really can’t afford.